Four Queens and a King…

Posted in OUT THERE - MAINE PHOTOGRAPHER SPOTLIGHT on May 21, 2010 by voxphotographs

This week, five stellar fine art photographers joined me for supper. Every other month I offer a “salon” evening in my Portland condo for a small group of Maine’s fine art photographers to try and recreate the days when people actually talked to each other face-to-face about something they were all passionate about – art, literature, music or philosophy.

For me, it’s all about fine art photography and there’s nothing I’d rather spend the evening doing than talking about it with the people in Maine who are actually making the photographs.

This time around I brought together Melonie Bennett, Felice Boucher, Rose Marasco, Jack Montgomery and Denise Froehlich, pictured in this order above. Each artist carted a sample of their work to the gallery and in this picture all five samples can be seen on the walls.

The fine art photography community in Maine needs to strengthen its impact and one way to do this is to make sure these artists know each other, learn from each other and move forward together to make an impact on the world’s art scene. At these salons the photographers who gather are so hungry for connection no introductions are necessary. Surrounded by their work in an intimate little group show, they dive right in getting to know each other and discussing the images on the wall.

So, what’s in it for me? Frankly – there needs to be a cohesive  fine art photography community in order for there to be a fine art photography market in Maine, so building the market also involves building the community. Without a community, there’s nothing to build visibility for. And I’m determined to do just that. I talk to the artists about creating dynamic websites, entering competitions, getting their work OUT THERE and supporting it non-stop including NOT donating work when requested by endless organizations that assume art is free and artists live by air alone. Demand to be paid and paid properly for your decades of shooting and level of expertise. I talk to them about culling their work for the very best pictures they can offer so we can build a fine art photography community that is second to none in this country. Trust me, the talent in this state is world-class. So let’s take it to the world.

So the three hours we spent around the dinner table talking about photography in general and these photographers’ work specifically is worth its weight in gold – for us all.

Getting connected – building a market. Getting visibility, selling fine art photographs. There’s a process here and the future is today.

The State of “Green” Printing

Posted in HOT NEW STUFF! on May 10, 2010 by jimnickelson

Myself and many of my fine art printing clients are conscious of the environmental impact of fine art printing. Through my research, I have not yet found any acceptable environmentally-conscious solutions to mitigate either the impact of the production of electronic equipment such as printers or the production of the inks used in color printing.

Paper, however, is one area where one can make an environmentally-friendly choice without sacrificing quality of the end result. The venerable German paper company Hahnemühle has recently introduced two new papers that I find to provide very high print quality with a significantly reduced environmental impact.

Their environmental bona fides come partially from their component materials.  Hahnemühle Fine Art Bamboo Paper is made from 90% bamboo (a highly renewable resource) and 10% recycled cotton rag.  Hahnemühle Fine Art Sugar Cane Paper is made of 75% of sugar cane waste byproduct (called bagasse) and 25% recycled cotton from Hahnemühle’s own mills.  Hahnemühle also uses 100% recycled materials for packaging, renewable energy to produce the paper, and donates a portion of sales to environmental projects.  You can find many details of their environmental efforts at their oddly named but highly informative Green Rooster site.

My favorite of the two papers is Hahnemühle Fine Art Bamboo. Available in all standard sizes in both sheet and roll, Bamboo provides a reasonably heavy weight (290 gsm) matte paper with a lovely lightly textured surface and decided warmtone due to its lack of optical brighteners (OBAs).  It is similar in print quality in many ways to Hahnemühle’s ubiquitous Photo Rag but significantly warmer in tone and with a smoother surface and a bit more dynamic range.  I recommend this paper for warmer images, particularly natural scenes, as well as warm-toned black & white work for which it is particularly lovely.

Hahnemühle Fine Art Sugar Cane is another excellent matte paper that is environmentally sensible. A slightly heavier paper than Bamboo that is also available in all standard sizes and formats, Sugar Cane’s biggest distinction is its more heavily textured surface. The surface is a bit hard to describe but it makes me think of a subtle directional weave. I personally prefer a smoother surface such as that of the Bamboo paper, but such a preference is a personal one and others may prefer Sugar Cane for certain applications. I plan on using it with some clients for specific projects where its unique textured surface can be a distinct advantage. Sugar Cane is free from OBA’s but not nearly as warm as Bamboo (though still warmer than neutral).

Hahnemühle should be applauded for taking leadership in mitigating their environmental impact and hopefully other manufacturers will follow suit.  Please comment if you have experience with either of these papers or if you know of any other available papers with reduced environmental impact.

- Jim Nickelson

Jim Nickelson Photography & Nickelson Editions

Old is good too!

Posted in EXHIBITS/SHOWS, Maine, ONLINE AWESOME on May 5, 2010 by voxphotographs

There are two places in Maine to see fabulous vintage photographs OF Maine…

© Maine Historical Museum. All Rights Reserved.

In Portland, the Maine Historical Society has opened up an exhibit at their Congress Street exhibition space called “EXPOSED: RARE PHOTOGRAPHS OF LIFE IN MAINE”. These are reproductions of photographs taken between 1860 (daguerreotypes) and 1975. The Society is opening up for First Fridays now so you can stop in and look while you’re in town for the other storefront gallery events.  Every month the exhibit will change, so put it on your must-see list. If you think you aren’t into vintage photos, you just haven’t seen great ones yet. It’s hard to find the link to the vintage photographs exhibits on the Society’s website, but if you go to their vintage Maine photographs site, you’ll see it.  Here’s a link to the page that provides you with a sneak preview of each month’s exhibits through October, 2010.

Kids on horse © Penobscot Marine Museum. Artist: Frederick Ross Sweetser. All Rights Reserved.

I just read a page in Bangor Metro magazine about the collection of nearly 100,000 vintage photographs in the collection of the Penobscot Marine Museum in Searsport. The Museum opens May 28 and will have many image exhibited through its season. Half of the collection is now online and if you don’t think this is a labor of love, talk to Kevin Johnson, the Museum’s photo archivist.

Small Group © Penobscot Marine Museum. Artist Frederick Ross Sweetser. All Rights Reserved.

Of course, VoxPhotographs has over 400 vintage images online to enjoy as well – categorized for making the hunt easier and more fun. Reproductions of all of them are available. All of the images on my site are anonymous – no known maker and I own the collection or the originals.

Examined to Death © VoxPhotographs. All  Rights Reserved.

Boothbay – Maine Photography Show…

Posted in EXHIBITS/SHOWS, Maine on April 25, 2010 by voxphotographs

Warmth © Sarah Litchfield. All rights reserved.

We had hoped to go to the opening of the Boothbay  Region Art Foundation’s annual Maine Photography Show, but got waylaid and had to blow it off. Glad we didn’t make the trip – we heard the small gallery was so packed for the opening that even many of the artists couldn’t get in the door!

Two VoxPhotographs artists – Jim Nickelson and Arla Patch – have work in the show and I dropped by to see the show Friday on my way up the coast. It’s only up until May 8 and the gallery open just Fri -Sun, so if you can get there it needs to be fairly soon.

Untitled (Lower Androscoggin) © Jared DeSimio. All Rights Reserved

——

Traditionally, it’s a show for all levels of photographers – a lot of shutterbugs and a few real pros. But I like to see what people of all levels are doing – especially digitally, seeing as the technology changes every minute! This year’s juror was John Paul Caponigro. Past recent jurors have been Elizabeth Greenberg of Maine Media Workshops and Susan Danly, Curator of Graphics, Photography and Contemporary Art at the Portland Museum of Art.

Fading Beauty © Felice Boucher. All Rights Reserved.

The first photograph in the show that made me catch my breath was Felice Boucher’s nude “Fading Beauty”. Not only was it a beautiful image, but it was beautifully presented – something many photographers need to do much better at. Boucher’s presentation indicated her respect for and investment in her own work before asking the rest of us to respect and invest in it – and if you want to be taken seriously as an artist, presenting your work properly is the first step.

As well, “Fading Beauty” is masterfully printed. Digital printing is a skill that needs to be developed and few digital photographers understand this. It’s too easy (and affordable) to purchase a decent printer and push the PRINT button. Sorry, folks. If you want to see superb quality digital printing, spend some time looking at “Fading Beauty” or Jim Nickelson’s ( www.nickelsoneditions.com is Jim’s digital printing business) “The Tarn” and then look at your own prints. If it doesn’t parallel the quality of these two images, do a favor for the fine art photography community and hire a skilled printer. Poor printing simply underscores the public perception that anyone can be a photographer. And certainly anyone can push a PRINT button, so that perception is not far off if your printing skills are not top-notch.

Wrench © Richard Barnett. All Rights Reserved.

Also in the stellar dept. are images by Elise Plakke (“Grey Day”), Jared DeSimio(“Untitled (Lower Androscoggin)”), Sarah Litchfield (“Warmth”) and Richard Barnett (“Wrench”). Gorgeous, original, all there.

Grey Day © Elise Plakke. All  Rights Reserved.

I also enjoyed  Heath Paley’s image (first place WATER category “Water Over Dam”), Sarah Petril (“Red Hat”), Liza Schlitz (diptych “Eat Beans”), Martha Lentz (“Solitary Tree”) and third place STUDENT award Ruth Gray’s “No Pictures Please”.

Water Over Dam © Heath Paley. All Rights Reserved.

—–

Solitary Tree © Martha Lentz. All Rights Reserved.

Thanks to the Boothbay Region Art Foundation for making space for this show. I hear their Art in the Park this year (Sept. 4) is going to be photography only. See you there.

The Tarn © Jim Nickelson. All Rights Reserved.

Abi’s gone international…

Posted in ONLINE AWESOME, READ THIS! on April 25, 2010 by voxphotographs

Can a country girl from Limerick, Maine strike gold in the international photography scene? Yup, it happens. Hard work, a unique vision and getting your work out there can pay big dividends.

Read Abigail Wellman’s story in the 4/25/10 issue of  Maine Sunday Telegram, written by Bob Keyes…

Colby Museum’s hidden treasures…

Posted in EXHIBITS/SHOWS, Maine on April 19, 2010 by voxphotographs

We just got back from Colby College Museum of Art. There are some photograph treasures there right now, as well as the impressive Alex Katz collection and some wonderful American painters’ works upstairs.

But – to the photographs. Norma B. Marin (daughter-in-law of John Marin) collected photographs for over 40 years and samples from that collection, dating from 1902 to 1983, are on view at the Museum kind of for the foreseeable future, I guess. It’s an odd little group of 22 images that didn’t have any other connection from what I could see, but I was pretty darn happy to see several of the images.

New York at Night (1934) © Berenice Abbott. All Rights Reserved.

The star of the show is Berenice Abbott’s “New York at Night” (1934). When you stare at this, please remember the year it was taken and be awed.  It is a spectacular photo and the word “spectacular” has nothing to do with the size of the print. It’s small. Small and beyond compare. Her “Woolworth Building” 1936 is another iconic Abbott – both images hit the photography community of the time right between the eyes and you’ll appreciate why when you see these vintage prints.


Cape Cod, 1972 © The Estate of Harry Callahan. All Rights Reserved.

Another print worth staring at is Harry Callahan’s “Untitled – From the series “Cape Cod” he made in the 1970′s. It’s 6″x7″ and exquisite in its simplicity, like most Callahans! Simple, but with the powerful punch of a champion boxer viewed in a match on TV with the sound turned off. It’s all visual punch.

Untitled (Nude),  1955 ©The Estate of Bill Brandt. All Rights Reserved.

The third image that knocked my socks off was Bill Brandt’s “Untitled (Nude)”, 1955. It’s a well-known image and when you see the vintage print you’ll swoon, it’s so gorgeous and a lot more subtle tones than the online version above.

The three Stieglitz photogravures are just lovely – again one of my favorite images that I’ve written about before, “The Hand of Man”, is in the group.

But here’s the secret: in the John Marin exhibit room adjacent to the photographs exhibit are some unexpected photographic nuggets: One is a tiny Stieglitz platinum print – a family portrait of Marin, his wife and son taken in 1921. Next to it is a 1953 painting (oil and graphite on canvas) that Marin made based on this portrait. He died that same year. The painting is titled “A Looking Back – The Marin Family”.

And then, to your left are four more photographic portraits, just of Marin himself: Arnold Newman (1947), Charles Sheeler (1951), Dorothy Norman (1947) and the beauty, the fantastic little gem: the 1928 portrait of Marin taken by Paul Strand in Georgetown, Maine. It’s all there in that little photo – the cigarette, the silhouette of the hat, the face in shadow, the dark tie on the white shirt.

In the room across the hall is an exhibit of African-American artists’ work and tucked into it is a fascinating portrait by James Van Der Zee titled “At Home, Josephine Becton (Variant)”, 1934. Take the time to look at the details in this vintage print – it’s a wonderful time capsule.

I always welcome the opportunity to view vintage prints of the masters and you aren’t going to have as many opportunities to do that in Maine as you might like, so take in the Colby exhibit and enjoy this small sip of heaven.

Seeing Portland – 1970 to 1984

Posted in EXHIBITS/SHOWS, Maine on April 12, 2010 by voxphotographs

Waiting For the Bus, 1978 © Joe Muir

——

Well, that was fun! We stayed in Portland this Saturday for the opening of  Seeing Portland – 1970 to 1984 at Zero Station on Anderson St. in Portland… got there just after 5 and had a few minutes to look at the work before it became a mob scene.

Five Girls © Andy Graham

There are nine artists included in this show and all the photographs were taken by them in the 70′s and early 80′s. (One of the artists included, Mark Rockwood, is represented by VoxPhotographs.) The images range from straight documentary to ones like Andy Graham’s big square color print above, which have a more in-your-face feel to them. The exhibit was Andy’s idea and he and two others curated it.

Some of the images were so poignant it made me shiver in not-altogether-positive recognition. Hard to believe I started college in 1971 and when I did the math, I had to do it twice before believing how many years ago that was. Others felt the same and told me so. For those at the opening who actually grew up in Portland during those years, they could hardly contain their delight at the childhood memories these photographs provoked. Several people told me they KNEW the people in some of the photographs.

But I felt better when I saw the wonderful inclusion of blurbs and photographs of the photographers themselves in the 70′s. Honestly, you’ve got to see these to believe them.

Rose Marasco, head of the Photography Dept. at USM had a great collection of photo collage images – very cleverly done. Here’s my favorite:

Carroll and Clark St., Photomontage Series © Rose Marasco

Mark Rockwood has had an interesting journey photographically and we’re celebrating his “history” next June (2011) with a retrospective that will include some of the Seeing Portland images. Here’s my favorite in the Seeing Portland show:

Alley Laundry © Mark Rockwood.

Seeing Portland: 1970 to 1984 is open at Zero Station until May 1. You can see it on Tues – Friday 10-5 and Saturdays 10-2 (www.zerostation.com) Online at the Portland Press Herald you can read more and see many more images than were able to be installed at the exhibit  by clicking on this article by Bob Keyes. http://www.pressherald.com/life/audience/that-70s-show_2010-04-04.html

A world without photographs…

Posted in READ THIS! on April 5, 2010 by voxphotographs

Because we are surrounded by photographs, it’s impossible to imagine a world without them. I’m reading Robert Taft’s 1938 book of essays “Photography and the American Scene” and it has been effective in getting the point across once again that the birth of photography in 1830 stood the world on its head.

Do you remember the first e-mail you received? How incredulous you were at the miracle of the internet? Well, the concept of freezing a second in time with an exact duplicate of that second – not an illustration – was a unfathomable wonder to the world. It was science, not art, at that point, and inventors and scientists were the ones working on the incredible concept of fixing an image of life on to….something. Metal? Paper? What would work?

First photograph/Joseph Nicephore Niépce, 1826

But my point here is, as Taft writes: “How would you describe a photograph if you had never seen one before and were totally unfamiliar with its appearance?”

Well, the editor of the New York  magazine The Knickerbocker was obviously rendered almost speechless. Here’s what he wrote upon seeing the first daguerreotypes: “We have seen the views taken in Paris… and have no hesitation in avowing that they are the most remarkable objects of curiosity and admiration in the arts we have ever beheld. Their exquisite perfection almost transcends the bounds of sober belief.”

Boulevard du Temple/Daguerre

You may think from this “Boulevard du Temple” daguerreotype that the streets of Paris weren’t used much, but the place was packed and humming nonstop! Consider that this is an exposure of perhaps 10 or more minutes – the only person not moving is the man having his boots blackened and therefore, he is the only person in this daguerreotype.

Many felt that because of this long exposure time required to make a daguerreotype, portraits using photography would never be possible. Daguerre himself told Samuel B. Morse, the first American to bring the daguerreotype process home, that he “held little hope for the practicability of portrait taking by his process”. Even though the above daguerreotype was exposed for over 10 minutes, the process quickly became more efficient and on a sunny day 5 minutes was possible.

Enter the Americans. In less than a year, Robert Cornelius, based in Philadelphia, made what is considered the first successful portrait using the daguerreotype process. Many others were trying too, including John W. Draper who made a wonderful daguerreotype portrait of his sister, Dorothy most likely in the summer of 1840. The exposure was probably less than 90 seconds and blinking is so rapid that unless the sitter closed her eyes for a length of time, the eyes would be photographed as open.

Dorothy Catherine Draper by John W. Draper (this image has totally faded away)

The excitement over the possibilities was enormous and again, it’s just plain hard to identify with it as ubiquitous as photographs are today. By the early 1850′s claims that over 3 million daguerreotype portraits were being made annually in this country were easily substantiated. Trading photographs with your friends and family members? It was a rage in Europe and the United States and I guess I can safely say, hasn’t stopped since.

Familiar faces at the Farnsworth

Posted in EXHIBITS/SHOWS, Maine on March 30, 2010 by voxphotographs

Visit the Farnsworth Art Museum in Rockland soon for several reasons, including some fun shopping in Rockland!!

I wanted one more chance to see that venerable Ansel Adams print of Eliot Porter’s and I did, but I was really headed downstairs to the small Arnold Newman exhibit.

A couple of people have already mentioned to me they expected this exhibit to be bigger, but the 29 images exhibited are a good overview of his styles and for me, it’s a good education. And I like its surprises, too.

For one, Newman photographed Cushing artist Alan Magee in 1990 at Maine Media Workshops. Cool.  But he photographed him through the plastic wall of the food hall tent. Even cooler. But what makes the portrait pretty darn amazing is that Newman’s own right HAND takes up a good chunk of the right side of the portrait! Seeing is believing…it’s a pretty unique shot for Arnold Newman!

Another reason Arnold Newman is truly one of the best portrait photographers in photography history is demonstrated by the Arno Minkkinen portrait he took in 2005 – not that long ago, remember. To say this artist did not get into ruts is an understatement and you can see why:

Arnold Newman, Arno Minkkinen, New york, NY, 2005 B/W Modern 11 7/8 x 9 15/16 inches. Arnold Newman/Getty Images

I think this actual image is from the Farnsworth exhibit catalog because obviously the one in the exhibit is not on a folded back page like this! But you’ve got to admit – this is a terrific image! The accompanying card on the wall says that Minkkinen’s hands are in the photograph and out of the photograph and that is true; however, there is another set of hands in the photograph and they should be referred to as well – they are a woman’s hands. I wonder who it is?

The Minkkinen image is surrounded by the classics – Newman’s famous portrait of the nutty-looking John Marin (1947) always makes me grin, I’m afraid. No choice but to let Marin dominate this photograph front and center! A beautiful portrait of John Sloan (1941), complete with paint-smeared smock and in front of his easel is why I am so in awe of Newman’s oeuvre.

I hope Kenneth Noland (1967) liked his Newman portrait: the artist is wedged in between two paintings in a very unique and brilliant composition that speaks volumes about the artist’s work.

Kenneth Noland (1967) © Arnold Newman/Getty Images

Mary Ellen Mark was photographed at Maine Media Workshops in the 80′s (didn’t write down the portrait date, sorry!). The obscuring slant of light and odd but hugely successful addition of a chair back in the center of the bottom of the portrait makes it totally unique as a portrait. You have to ask yourself – why did he do that? One of the exhibit cards quotes Newman as saying “Portrait photography is 90% moving furniture and 10% photography.” I guess so!

You’ll get prepped for the Louise Nevelson exhibit on the Museum’s main floor gallery by the haunting image of her in the Arnold Newman exhibit.

The famous Edward Hopper image, where Hopper is seated outside and down the hill a bit from the front of his studio is beyond brilliant. What the info. card is remiss in not saying is – that Jo Hopper is flitting about in the background next to the studio! Definitely part of the Newman plan for this portrait, and an important one, I would imagine.

I laughed out loud in disbelief when I saw the Edward Steichen (1955) portrait. I remember Steichen from the film made in the last years of his life at his home in CT, I think – a wiry curmudgeon with a long gray beard – but here he is looking exactly like a contented insurance salesman. Tell me I’m wrong when you see it!

And last, but not least, is the deceptively simple portrait of Milton Avery. I think Newman did a lot of furniture moving for this one, or maybe he just got it right the first time. In any event, it’s perfect.

You can see the Avery portrait and a whole page of Arnold Newman portraits go to his official website and click on Gallery and then PORTRAITS. Newman’s online presence is tightly controlled by Getty Images, which makes for a less exciting blog posting, but may the Farnsworth exhibit (which runs through August 8th) motivate you to spend time online seeing more.

Stieglitz had bad days too….

Posted in READ THIS! on March 20, 2010 by voxphotographs

Picture this: In 1911 Alfred Stieglitz installed the first United States show of Pablo Picasso’s work at Stieglitz’ gallery “291″. Besides his own purchase of one piece, nothing else sold. They were $25 each.

And the reviews? Well… you can see for yourself that Stieglitz was the laughing stock of the Big Apple – here’s an excerpt of the review that ran in the New York Globe:
“The display is the most extraordinary combination of extravagance and absurdity that New York has yet to be inflicted with, and goodness knows it has had many these two seasons past.  Any sane criticism is entirely out of the question; any serious analysis would be vain.  The results suggest the most violent wards of an asylum for maniacs, the craziest emanations of a disordered mind, the gibberings of a lunatic!” (-Arthur Hoeber)

If you are a member of the fine art photography community in Maine, or in the world, or actually if you are a member of the human race, you know what a bad day can be like. (I’ll never sell another photograph. Nobody cares except mom and even she keeps asking me if I’ve sold a photograph recently. I blasted out my newest photograph and nobody responded. If I died, no one would notice, etc…)

Well, I bought a book at the Portland Museum of Art a couple of weeks ago titled “HOW TO READ A PHOTOGRAPH – Lessons from Master Photographers” by Ian Jeffrey. If you’ve read this blog for any amount of time you know the subject I’m most passionate about is photography history so I’m an easy mark for any book like this.

So today I’m up to Stieglitz. Stieglitz definitely had more than his share of bad days. Here are some more samples, most of which are in this book:

In 1890, Stieglitz returned to the US after 9 years in Germany, etc… and became deeply depressed. (Well, who can blame him, considering the wide gulf with respect to “culture” between European aesthetics and the wild and woolly go-go “let’s make a million bucks” sentiments of the exploding young United States of America?) But here’s where it gets interesting for me and everyone else in the world who cares about photography: In 1892 he was wandering around NYC with one of those newfangled “hand cameras” and although they were widely disparaged as something no serious photographer would use, Stieglitz found them perfect for taking unposed, instinctive street images. He happened by the Terminal-Astor House one wintery bleak day and saw a driver tending to his steaming street-car horses and in that moment, Stieglitz says “America was saved for me. I was no longer alone.” He could express his deepest emotions through his camera he realized upon viewing this scene. He could connect with this place. And he took one of the world’s most iconic photographs and one of my very, very favorites, “The Terminal”:

This photograph (cropped from the original 1892 image as Stieglitz never stopped trying to reach perfection with his work, even 40 years later) pulses with life and emotion, not to mention brilliance of design and rendering.

Then, Stieglitz had joined the “Society of Amateur Photographers” in 1891, but it turns out that photography was losing traction as a hobby and when it looked like the club was going to turn itself into a bicycle club, Stieglitz moved on. Another very bad day. But he joined the “Camera Club of New York” and founded a periodical called Camera Notes“, which in turn prompted him to found another periodical Camera Work which became a seminal publication for the future of fine art photography. (I wrote way back that MECA (Maine College of Art) actually has many of these issues in their rare books room and you can make an appointment to see them – students used to be able to check them in the 70′s and some of the pages are, well, “missing”.)

—–

Okay, three bad days that turned out to be turning points for Stieglitz and the rest of us, unknowingly. Hmm… is there a lesson here?

A very bad day for Stieglitz, and everyone else for that matter, was the day American entered into war with Germany. He was German. He loved the United States, his new home. The public attention turned to war and “291″ closed in 1917. But he didn’t stay down: In 1925 he opened the “Intimate Gallery” and then in 1930 held court at “An American Place”, the latter being one of the most important springboards for the future generation of photographers.

Successful people have one thing in common always: they stick to it and keep going. You can change the world that way. Or at the very least and perhaps most importantly, your world.

Bill Clinton spent a lot of his time reading about past US Presidents and how they operated. He knew that when you become a star, or a leader, you inevitably hit a lot of brick walls. But the important thing here is not to listen to those sitting at the bottom of the wall telling you that it’s no use, there’s no way over, that it can’t be done. Many considered Alfred Stieglitz to be an ego-centric know-it-all and a fool for his taste in art. But he didn’t listen. He was too busy scaling walls and changing the course of history for the rest of us.

Hands, 1918, Alfred Stieglitz